JWT Signing Algorithms Explained
Detailed guide on using the JWT Encoder.
JWT Signing Algorithms Explained
JWT supports several categories of signing algorithms. Choosing the right one depends on your security requirements.
HMAC (HS256, HS384, HS512)
HMAC algorithms use a shared secret for both signing and verification.
Pros: Simple, fast, no key management | Cons: Secret must be shared securely
Best for: Internal services, single-server applications
RSA (RS256, RS384, RS512)
RSA uses a public-private key pair. The private key signs, the public key verifies.
Pros: Strong security, widely supported | Cons: Slower than HMAC
Best for: APIs where the verifier cannot hold the signing key
RSA-PSS (PS256, PS384, PS512)
A modern variant of RSA with probabilistic signature scheme.
Pros: Better security properties than RS* | Cons: Slightly slower, less library support
ECDSA (ES256, ES384, ES512)
Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm — smaller keys than RSA for equivalent security.
Pros: Smaller signatures, faster than RSA | Cons: Requires proper random nonce
EdDSA (Ed25519)
Modern Edwards-curve signature algorithm.
Pros: Fast, secure, constant-time | Cons: Newer — fewer libraries support it
Algorithm Security Overview
| Algorithm | Key Size | Security Level | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| HS256 | 256+ bits | Medium (symmetric) | Very Fast |
| RS256 | 2048+ bits | High | Slow |
| ES256 | 256 bits | High | Fast |
| EdDSA | 256 bits | Very High | Fast |